LiquidPlanner ($45.00 at Liquid Planner) is one of only a few that does make its prices known. It's hard to compare Workfront's estimated cost to that of other enterprise-grade apps because not many of them charge flat rates. You can request a free trial of the tool to give it a spin, but it requires filling out a form and having Workfront contact you to set it up. ![]() Workfront is available in four package tiers, depending on how sophisticated a client's work management needs are." "Prices depend on the type of users/permission level granted to different people in the account. "Pricing starts at about $30 per user per month," my contact explained. ![]() I asked a company representative to share some ballpark figures of how much a typical organization can expect to pay. Workfront doesn't list prices on its website because, like many enterprise tools, the cost varies based on each organization's setup and installation. For enterprises, LiquidPlanner remains the Editors' Choice, although on average it's more expensive than Workfront, depending on the setup and customization needed. ![]() Another very good option that lies somewhere between Asana and Workfront is Editors' Choice Podio, which is also suitable for businesses ranging from the small to the large. If that doesn't describe your business, Workfront probably delivers more than you need.įor smaller organizations, especially those with a flat org chart and ethos of openness and visibility, I recommend instead looking at collaboration tools that are less rigid, such as Editors' Choice Asana. It's adept at managing very large workloads. ![]() Workfront looks formal and businessy, and it is. This online system enables employees to manage tasks, track the progress of projects, balance resources, watch budgets, and even review and approve work. It's designed for enterprise-size organizations, rather than small businesses. Workfront, formerly AtTask, is a high-end project management application that also tackles work management more generally.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |